Examples of primary sources relative to our topic are included in the printable version of the resource booklet and primary source set above. You are also encouraged to visit the Library of Congress Resources page above to locate collections, exhibits and more sources of digitized primary sources.
One conservative faction would like to view the communist system as responsible for fascism. This speculation claims that the destruction of social class distinctions by the Bolsheviks prepared the way for racial murders of the Nazis. The extermination of the Jews is presented as a distorted copy of a previous model, rather than as a unique occurrence.
Other social scientists have protested against viewing Nazi crimes in such a relativistic way. They see an aura of normality being created and fear that the basic anti fascist consensus in the Federal republic might end.
They are also apprehensive about the analogy to current politics and warn against a restoration by means of history. The dispute concerns the question: Is the Holocaust continuous with the rest of European history, or does it represent a unique event, a break in the continuum of history?
Such exciting and dangerous speculation belongs to a sort of metaphysical thinking that has a long tradition in German historiography. As a sociologist, I would like to take a more modest starting point: Is what the Nazis did to their internal enemies unique or totally surprising?
Investigating concentration camps from a sociological perspective, one does not confront a phenomenon that is singular and interesting, while at the same time ordinary and banal. No special attention is given to the "actors of history. A morsel of normality is discovered in the atrocities, without in the least belittling them.
Regarding Nazi atrocities in this way has its price; it represses emotion. It focuses on details, rather than on the Holocaust as a whole. Understanding the preconditions of a terror means studying its construction, develop ment, and operation in detail.
In this essay, I would like to consider the aims of the terror and concentrate on the non-Jewish categories of prisoners, using homosexuals as an example.
The concentration camp was one weapon in the campaign to bring state and society into conformity with fascism. If physical extermination formed the most frightful instrument of that policy, it was not the only one. A range of attempts were made to isolate people and to use fear to inhibit "undesirable" behavior.
Whatever the reasons for imprisonment, all incarcerations were the result of Nazi ideology and posed a danger to the prisoner's life. The categories of prisoners differed from one another in how they were selected and treated.
Those groups whom the Nazis deemed inimical but not racially undesirable were not completely rounded up, but taken only in random samples They also fared differently within the camps. Homosexuals, political prisoners, and Jehovah's Witnesses are among the groups who were sent to the concentration camps for reeducation.
They were supposed to renounce their particular orientation. The very fact of their incarceration restrained their ideological comrades outside the camps from becoming active in the struggle against Nazism.
Democratic freedom makes pluralism possible. In democracies, deviations from the norm concern not only criminality but also sexuality, ethnicity, religion, and attitudes toward work.Thus ended the largest mass murder in a single location in human history.
other Nazi concentration camp and probably than at any death camp in history.
trains to other concentration camps. 'Night' by Elie Wiesel: Summary and Analysis He has survived through one of the most horrifying Nazi concentration camps, at Auschwitz, Poland.
The book is a memoir of his days at the Auschwitz camp. He wrote the book 10 years after his ordeals. Characteristics of a Shakespearean Tragedy.
Types of Poetry: All the Different Types . Mar 03, · THIRTEEN years ago, researchers at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum began the grim task of documenting all the ghettos, slave labor sites, concentration camps .
The term concentration camp is a general term to describe all of the camps, but there were four different categories of camps. These are labor, death, holding, and transit.
Claim: Gay men incarcerated in Nazi concentration camps during World War II were forced back into prison even after the Allied forces won that tranceformingnlp.com Without putting them into concentration camps?
STEELE: And I would even say, Stephanie, to that point, it’s not even an interpretation of the law, it .